Language and Art

                 Language and Art              (From: A Theory for Art)        If language is employed without due care Or understanding of its latencies, It easily misleads the sense of those Who are unwary of its subtleties – Accreted over centuries – that cause Inaccurate interpretations or Complete […]

                 Language and Art

             (From: A Theory for Art)

 

     If language is employed without due care

Or understanding of its latencies,

It easily misleads the sense of those

Who are unwary of its subtleties –

Accreted over centuries – that cause

Inaccurate interpretations or

Complete incomprehensibility.

 

     Art is the language of emotions, writ

In international symbols, shaped to be

Expressive of the most profound concerns

Mankind can draw from its experience

Of past, of present, of futurity;

Of fact or fancy, fantasy or myth,

Or insightful imagination’s flair.

Art is the lingua franca of the mind,

(The English of emotive intercourse),

Which all intuitively understand.

 

     The art of language is to be exact –

To find expressions which precisely match

Each nuance of the matters they describe –

That others may be brought to recognise

And understand the subjects though they were,

(Until that moment), quite unknown to them.

Clear exposition is no facile skill –

Whatever language is employed – it is

An artform in itself whose excellence

Is won through practice and due diligence.

 

     The language of art is symbolical:

It re-presents reality and truth,

(As artists wish those concepts to appear

Within their audiences’ consciousness),

By redefining universal themes

Instinct within the psychic reservoir

Which culture and experience have filled,

Through countless ages of development,

Inside the neural networks of their brains.

 

     The language of art is pictorial.

It limns in imagistic words, (or marks

Pencilled, inked, brushed or etched on surfaces),

Invisible, intangible ideas –

Originating in the artist’s brain –

And so embodies them with physical

Reality that others can perceive

Them and evaluate their meanings’ worth.

 

     For artists, (as for scientists), all signs

Are instruments for special purposes –

Like surgeons’ scalpels sharp, incisive, clean –

Requiring deft precision in their use

To excise cancerous opacities

And other threatening malignancies

Whilst leaving healthy tissues unimpaired.

 

     Signs are constructive, too; they build

Significances and allow those who

Are skilled in their deployment to transmute

Banalities into magnificent

Re-presentations of experience

Almost alchemical in their effects.

 

     For artists, mastery of signs – their tools –

Is the best foundation for their work;

For only when achieved may they indulge

In such infractions of the basic rules

As will enhance the impact of a piece,

(Without impairing its integrity

Of purpose, or the meaning it conveys),

On those who are exposed to what it says.

 

     For poets, language also is the art

Of sounds. To marry signs with sounds and sense

Requires refined discriminating skills

That poets – like music composers – should

Develop conscientiously along

With metrics, rhythmical control and range

Of tone. These elements, combined, invest

A work with colour and emotional

Effects essential to evoke, (in those

Who read or hear), precisely what was meant

To be vicariously experienced.

Author: J. A. Bosworth

See Home Page on this site.

See all posts by (359)

Leave a Reply